<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spinnaker’s 2009 NFL preseason power rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unfspinnaker.com/sports/2009/06/03/spinnaker%e2%80%99s-2009-nfl-preseason-power-rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unfspinnaker.com/sports/2009/06/03/spinnaker%e2%80%99s-2009-nfl-preseason-power-rankings/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=spinnaker%25e2%2580%2599s-2009-nfl-preseason-power-rankings</link>
	<description>Official Newspaper of the University of North Florida</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:07:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DiPiazza</title>
		<link>http://www.unfspinnaker.com/sports/2009/06/03/spinnaker%e2%80%99s-2009-nfl-preseason-power-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-11473</link>
		<dc:creator>DiPiazza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unfspinnaker.com/?p=1899#comment-11473</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m questioning the underachieving Chargers&#039; ranking.  They&#039;re not in the top 10.  Put the Cards, Bears, Jets, Titans, and Panthers ahead of them.   Prediction Bears win Superbowl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m questioning the underachieving Chargers&#8217; ranking.  They&#8217;re not in the top 10.  Put the Cards, Bears, Jets, Titans, and Panthers ahead of them.   Prediction Bears win Superbowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy</title>
		<link>http://www.unfspinnaker.com/sports/2009/06/03/spinnaker%e2%80%99s-2009-nfl-preseason-power-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-11076</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unfspinnaker.com/?p=1899#comment-11076</guid>
		<description>20th??? 20th??? You rank the Texans 20th in the league??? It&#039;s obvious you haven&#039;t been paying attention. The Texans quite possibly are the most improved team in football and ARE a playoff contender. I won&#039;t argue your top 4 but after that, what did you use to rank teams; a Ouija board?? Jets, Titans and Chargers did their very best to go backwards or at best stay the same and you rank them in front of the Texans. Not very likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20th??? 20th??? You rank the Texans 20th in the league??? It&#8217;s obvious you haven&#8217;t been paying attention. The Texans quite possibly are the most improved team in football and ARE a playoff contender. I won&#8217;t argue your top 4 but after that, what did you use to rank teams; a Ouija board?? Jets, Titans and Chargers did their very best to go backwards or at best stay the same and you rank them in front of the Texans. Not very likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Den</title>
		<link>http://www.unfspinnaker.com/sports/2009/06/03/spinnaker%e2%80%99s-2009-nfl-preseason-power-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-10241</link>
		<dc:creator>Den</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unfspinnaker.com/?p=1899#comment-10241</guid>
		<description>Although I agree with your #1, 2, and 3 picks beyond that I have no idea what you are basing your facts upon.  I foresee the Texas around 10 or 11, the colts will trail along with the titans in the AFC South.  Jaguars are bottom feeders again.  I think this year will be the team who has the best defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I agree with your #1, 2, and 3 picks beyond that I have no idea what you are basing your facts upon.  I foresee the Texas around 10 or 11, the colts will trail along with the titans in the AFC South.  Jaguars are bottom feeders again.  I think this year will be the team who has the best defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smack</title>
		<link>http://www.unfspinnaker.com/sports/2009/06/03/spinnaker%e2%80%99s-2009-nfl-preseason-power-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-10194</link>
		<dc:creator>smack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unfspinnaker.com/?p=1899#comment-10194</guid>
		<description>Your top four picks look good, except I would pick the patriots to finish first instead of the steelers (and I&#039;m not a pats fan).  However, two of your picks are disturbing...apparently, you haven&#039;t been paying attention to the redskins recent acquisitions.  They will make the playoffs for sure this year, which would place them somewhere in the top ten power rankings. And also, tampa bay may not be the same team they were years ago, but they&#039;re definitely not one of the worst teams in the league.  Lastly, I&#039;m a falcons fan, so I&#039;m excited about any high ranking they may receive from critics (you gave them #7), but couldn&#039;t you have given them a #5 or #6 power rank.  For some reason, that #7 ranking scares the dog poop out of me. (And by the way, reinstate Mike Vick)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your top four picks look good, except I would pick the patriots to finish first instead of the steelers (and I&#8217;m not a pats fan).  However, two of your picks are disturbing&#8230;apparently, you haven&#8217;t been paying attention to the redskins recent acquisitions.  They will make the playoffs for sure this year, which would place them somewhere in the top ten power rankings. And also, tampa bay may not be the same team they were years ago, but they&#8217;re definitely not one of the worst teams in the league.  Lastly, I&#8217;m a falcons fan, so I&#8217;m excited about any high ranking they may receive from critics (you gave them #7), but couldn&#8217;t you have given them a #5 or #6 power rank.  For some reason, that #7 ranking scares the dog poop out of me. (And by the way, reinstate Mike Vick)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.unfspinnaker.com/sports/2009/06/03/spinnaker%e2%80%99s-2009-nfl-preseason-power-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-9946</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unfspinnaker.com/?p=1899#comment-9946</guid>
		<description>ur an idiot putting the cardinals as nine first off half backs hightower james and wells receivers boldin fitz and breaston all recieved over 1000 each not to menchine 2 new offensive and defensive coaches plus the fact that we won the nfc last season not new york or philly az cardinals shock the world 09 superbowl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ur an idiot putting the cardinals as nine first off half backs hightower james and wells receivers boldin fitz and breaston all recieved over 1000 each not to menchine 2 new offensive and defensive coaches plus the fact that we won the nfc last season not new york or philly az cardinals shock the world 09 superbowl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

